Editorial policy

Clear Design Journal aims to explain interface design accurately and independently. Our writing separates visible details from interpretation, names uncertainty when it matters and gives readers enough context to judge an example for themselves.

Accuracy and context

We check factual statements against appropriate sources and review examples in context rather than judging a single screen as if it stood alone. Design choices can serve different purposes for different audiences, so we avoid presenting preference as proof or claiming that one layout works for everyone. Where a point depends on assumptions, limitations or a particular setting, we say so.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for the reader, not to secure a placement or endorse a product. A mention of a service, tool or organisation is not a recommendation unless the text explicitly says otherwise and explains its basis. Partners do not control our conclusions, article selection or corrections.

Corrections

Readers can report a possible error through the Contact page. We review specific, verifiable concerns and update material when a correction is warranted. When a change materially affects the meaning of an article, we make the correction clear in the article rather than quietly leaving readers with the original error.

Paid material and illustrations

Paid partnerships and other material created in collaboration are clearly identified where they appear, so readers can distinguish them from independent editorial work. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; when an illustration is AI-generated, we identify it as such. Illustrations are not evidence for an article's claims.